2015-07-28 13:07:44蘿蔔
inertial sensor不足以克服particular machine test?
Thales Visionix v. USA and Elbit Systems (Ct. Fed. Clm. 2015).
此claim所包含的方法在於 an element adapted to ... configured to determine an orientation...而根據說明書,此方法為一數學式,inertial sensor對此數學式而言,是無意義的限制.
The claims allow for the application of the navigation equation in almost endless environments, and are not limited to a fighter jet and a pilot’s helmet. . . .
此外,CAFC很重視abstract idea的操作環境
心得:
(1)不是隨意加上particular machine就可以克服particular machine test.
(2)particular machine必須用來執行abstract idea才具有可專利性.
(3)限定操作環境有助於可專利的適格性
在cybersourse一案,CAFC舉例解釋以particular machine必須用來執行abstract idea
For example, in SiRF Tech., we found that claims to a “method for calculating an absolute position of a GPS receiver and an absolute time of recep-tion of satellite signals” recited patent-eligible subject matter. 601 F.3d at 1331. The court noted that we were “not dealing with . . . a method that [could] be performed without a machine” and that there was “no evidence . . . that the calculations [could] be performed entirely in the human mind.” Id. at 1333. To the contrary, we found it was “clear that the methods at issue could not be per-formed without the use of a GPS receiver.” Id. at 1332.
1. A system for tracking the motion of an object relative to a moving reference frame, comprising:
a first inertial sensor mounted on the tracked object;
a second inertial sensor mounted on the moving reference frame; and
an element adapted to receive signals from said first and second inertial sensors and configured to determine an orientation of the object relative to the moving reference frame based on the signals received from the first and second inertial sensors.
"[Regarding Alice Step 2] the system claim fails to transform the method claim into a patent-eligible invention. "此claim所包含的方法在於 an element adapted to ... configured to determine an orientation...而根據說明書,此方法為一數學式,inertial sensor對此數學式而言,是無意義的限制.
The claims allow for the application of the navigation equation in almost endless environments, and are not limited to a fighter jet and a pilot’s helmet. . . .
此外,CAFC很重視abstract idea的操作環境
心得:
(1)不是隨意加上particular machine就可以克服particular machine test.
(2)particular machine必須用來執行abstract idea才具有可專利性.
(3)限定操作環境有助於可專利的適格性
在cybersourse一案,CAFC舉例解釋以particular machine必須用來執行abstract idea
For example, in SiRF Tech., we found that claims to a “method for calculating an absolute position of a GPS receiver and an absolute time of recep-tion of satellite signals” recited patent-eligible subject matter. 601 F.3d at 1331. The court noted that we were “not dealing with . . . a method that [could] be performed without a machine” and that there was “no evidence . . . that the calculations [could] be performed entirely in the human mind.” Id. at 1333. To the contrary, we found it was “clear that the methods at issue could not be per-formed without the use of a GPS receiver.” Id. at 1332.
上一篇："互動介面"未脫離一般電腦的範疇
下一篇：抽象概念的可專利性