86X2211,中國人請不要自己作賤自己，全中國都是“目不識丁”的文盲！？週四，2016年4月7日請跟隨：今天的日程安排〈E2〉

86X2211, Chinese people do not own degrades himself, the whole of China are "illiterate" illiterate! ? Thursday, April 7, 2016 follow: Today's schedule <E2>

寄件者: "Dan Johnson" [info@mail.whitehouse.gov]
寄件日期: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 22:44:18 +0800
收件者: [t_history@pchome.com.tw]
主旨: Professor Obama    主旨：奧巴馬教授

Before he was President, he was a law professor. My professor.

Then-professor, now President Barack Obama, Ellen Fulton, Joe Khan, and me in 1999 at University of Chicago Law School.

For more than 10 years, President Obama taught at the University of Chicago Law School, an institution known for its commitment to full and vigorous debate from all sides of the intellectual spectrum. It's where the late Justice Antonin Scalia served as a professor for several years and developed his originalist view of the Constitution. It’s a school where all points of view are treated with respect and are subject to the same rigorous challenge.

And it's where President Obama will return this afternoon for the first time since moving into the White House to talk with law students about the enduring benefits of an impartial Supreme Court and how the current confirmation process holds the potential long-term consequences for some of our most important constitutional values.

Tune in here to the conversation at 3:30 pm Eastern to catch the President’s conversation on the Supreme Court.

For the first time in recent memory, Senate Republicans are flatly refusing to consider a Supreme Court nomination because they hope another party will win the next election. It isn't clear whether the Senate will ultimately deny the President's nominee a hearing or a vote for the entire year, so before positions harden, this is a good time for all of us to step back and think about the broader costs of this potential action to our judiciary.

Professor Obama always insisted on class discussion. He didn’t like to lecture. Rather, he liked to present difficult questions and require students to consider the logical extension of their arguments and decide whether they still maintained their positions.

Professor Obama, like most law professors, used hypotheticals to illustrate his point. So consider this one: What if the next Senate declared that absolutely no Supreme Court appointments would be considered not just in the last year of the President's term, but for the President's entire term, regardless of how many vacancies might pile up, because they hoped someone else would be elected four years later?

We all want judges that are respected, independent, nonpartisan, and fair to everyone. It's not easy to create an impartial judicial system when the people who select and confirm our judges are elected and inherently partisan, especially when it requires collaboration between the President and Senate leadership, who often represent different parties. Thus, we rely on political leaders overcoming the political calculations of the moment in order to preserve something that benefits all of us: a truly independent system of justice.

So join in today at 3:30 pm Eastern here and share your own thoughts on this issue using the hashtag #SCOTUS.

There is something precious and powerful about an independent judiciary, a branch of government that can and must maintain its impartiality in our political system. It’s hard to do.

I don't think we want future law professors to explain how 2016 began a cycle of blatant partisanship in judicial appointments and confirmations. An independent judiciary, born from the heart of our Constitution, is too important to imperil.

That's one of the lessons I learned from Professor Obama. I hope our Senators take that lesson to heart as well.

Thanks,

Dan

Dan Johnson
Class of 2000
University of Chicago Law
Chicago, IL

This email was sent to t_history@pchome.com.tw.
Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy
Please do not reply to this email. Contact the White House

The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW • Washington, DC 20500 • 202-456-1111

白宮，華盛頓

他是總統之前，他是一名法學教授。我的教授。

當時的教授，現在奧巴馬總統埃倫·富爾頓，喬汗和我於1999年在芝加哥大學法學院。

對於超過10年，美國總統奧巴馬任教於芝加哥大學法學院，其從智能頻譜各方充分和激烈的辯論的承諾而聞名的機構的大學。這也正是已故大法官安東寧斯卡利亞擔任了好幾年的教授，發展了他的憲法originalist視圖。這也正是所有的觀點都受到尊重並受到同樣嚴格的挑戰，一所學校。

而且這也正是奧巴馬總統將回到今天下午的第一次，因為搬進白宮與法律專業的學生約一個公正的最高法院的持久利益，以及如何在當前的確認進程持有的潛在的長期後果的一些談話我們最重要的憲法價值。

收聽這裡下午3:30東部談話趕上總統的最高法院交談。

對於在最近的記憶中第一次，參議院共和黨斷然拒絕考慮最高法院提名，因為他們希望另一方將贏得下次選舉。目前尚不清楚參議院是否會最終拒絕總統的提名聽證會或全年一票，所以位置變硬之前，這是一個很好的時間對我們所有人來說退一步想想這種潛在的更廣泛的成本行動，我們的司法機構。

奧巴馬教授始終堅持在課堂討論。他不喜歡講課。相反，他喜歡目前困難的問題，並要求學生考慮他們的論據合乎邏輯的延伸，並決定他們是否仍然保持自己的立場。

奧巴馬教授最喜歡的法學教授，用hypotheticals來說明他的觀點。因此，考慮這樣一條：如果什麼接下來參議院宣稱絕對沒有最高法院的任命將不只是在總統任期的最後一年，但總統的整個任期內加以考慮，不管有多少空缺可能會堆積起來，因為他們希望別人會四年後當選？

我們都希望是受人尊敬的，獨立的，無黨派和公正的法官每一個人。這並不容易，當誰選擇並確認我們的法官的人當選，本來黨派建立一個公正的司法系統，特別是當它要求總統和參議院的領導，誰往往代表不同的政黨之間的合作。因此，我們依靠政治領導人克服當下的政治算計，以維護的東西，有利於我們所有人：司法真正獨立的系統。

所以在今天參加下午3:30東部在這裡分享自己的思想關於使用＃標籤#SCOTUS這個問題。

也有一些是寶貴的，功能強大的關於司法獨立，政府的一個分支，可以而且必須保持其在我國的政治制度的公正性。這是很難做到的。

我不認為我們希望未來的法學教授來講解如何開始2016年公然黨派的週期在司法任命和確認。司法獨立，從我們的憲法的心臟天生的，是太重要了危害。

這是我從奧巴馬教授吸取的教訓之一。我希望我們的參議員採取教訓心臟為好。

謝謝，

擔

丹詹森
2000等級
芝加哥大學法律大學
伊利諾伊州芝加哥
訪問WhiteHouse.gov

此電子郵件發送到t_history@pchome.com.tw。
退訂|隱私政策
請不要回复此郵件。聯繫白宮

白宮•1600賓夕法尼亞大道NW•華盛頓特區20500•202-456-1111