2007-11-30 21:27:14Macoto Chen
記住自己：Taipei Times的採訪報導
這是近幾天由Taipei Times記者對筆者所做的採訪報導，內容主要在談論高雄走路工事件判決的政治影響問題，有興趣的讀者或網友也可參考看看，又對筆者而言，則將之視為日記心得雜項的一部分，從而將其轉載至部落格（教學網）......
ANALYSIS: Vote-buying ruling bad news, analysts say
By Flora Wang
STAFF REPORTERS
Friday, Nov 30, 2007, Page 3
As legislative hopefuls gear up for their campaigns ahead of the Jan. 12 legislative elections, last Friday’s ruling on vote-buying allegations concerning the Kaohsiung mayoral election risks generating more controversy before their campaigns are over, political analysts said.
The Kaohsiung District Court acquitted Ku Hsin-ming (古鋅酩) and Tsai Neng-hsiang (蔡能祥) of vote-buying charges, finding they had "solicited" votes for last December’s mayoral poll, not bought them.
The allegations surfaced when the campaign camp of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) mayoral candidate, Chen Chu (陳菊), accused Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Huang Chun-ying’s (黃俊英) camp of bribing voters at a last minute press conference late on the night before the election.
After Chen won the election, Huang went to court, demanding the election results be annulled on the basis that Chen’s midnight press conference left him no time to respond to the accusation, thereby causing his defeat by the razor-thin margin of 1,140 votes.
Huang won in the first trial against Chen, but lost in the second and final trial on Nov. 16, in which the Kaohsiung branch of the Taiwan High Court said Chen’s victory was valid.
Ku later admitted that he had rented two buses to transport voters to an election rally for Huang on the eve of the election and paid them on the return trip from the rally for their votes for "a candidate in the Kaohsiung mayoral election and a Kaohsiung City councilor candidate."
The court found that although the two defendants admitted they had paid NT$500 per person, the money should be considered payment for time and energy spent at the rally, rather than as a bribe as defined under the Public Officials Election and Recall Law (公職人員選舉罷免法).
The court said that payment made at campaign events organized by groups to solicit support for a specific candidate are not equivalent to vote-buying.
Kaohsiung Prosecutor Lin Yung-fu (林永富), who probed the case and indicted Ku and Tsai, told the Taipei Times that the court’s decision was unreasonable.
A "payment" is made by an employer to an employee, he said.
Ku offered individuals on the bus NT$500 each and asked them to vote for "a candidate in the Kaohsiung mayoral election and a Kaohsiung City councilor candidate," he said, adding that this does not meet the definition of payment for labor, and therefore constitutes a bribe.
The prosecutors have said they will appeal the ruling.
Chang Hsueh-ming (張學明), lead prosecutor at the Kaohsiung branch of the Taiwan High Court Prosecutors’ Office, said the ruling had damaged the judiciary by deviating from sentences handed down in similar cases.
Five supporters of Luo Wen-chia (羅文嘉), a former DPP candidate for Taipei County commissioner, were found guilty by the Banciao District Court for paying a NT$300 "walking fee" to selected participants at a campaign rally in November 2005, he said.
In another case, a campaign manager for Taiwan Solidarity Union Legislator Lo Chih-ming (羅志明) was found guilty in Kaohsiung last year, Chang said.
Chang said that prosecutors already suspected vote-buying would occur ahead of the legislative elections -- in particular because a new system will halve the number of legislative seats -- but the Kaoshiung District Court ruling risks sending the message that "walking fees" are an acceptable way to "solicit" votes, thereby increasing vote-buying activity.
The Supreme Court last week released a list of actions that constitute vote-buying -- including the payment of "walking fees."
Deputy Minister of Justice Lee Chin-yung (李進勇) has warned legislative candidates not to be take Kaoshiung’s "special verdict" as a sign that violating the law is acceptable or that "walking fees" are not illegal.
He said any candidate or campaigners who pays such a fee to a voter would be charged with vote-buying.
Yang Chun-chih (楊鈞池), a government and law professor at the National University of Kaohsiung, said the ruling was expected to have a negative impact on how candidates run their campaigns.
"Giving people money for participating in a campaign event has long been prohibited by our society’s ethical norms," Yang said, adding that the incident would set a negative example for campaigners.
"Our electoral system has long been criticized because candidates tend to spend a great amount of money on campaigning ... This verdict was tantamount to encouraging candidates to give out as much money as they can," he said.
Yang, whose main research field is Japanese and US law, said that all ambiguities should be removed from the Election and Recall Law for Civil Servants, and all banned campaign activities should be named in the law.
US and Japanese law are clear on this matter, he said.
Yang said, however, that it remained unclear whether the ruling would affect the outcome of the January polls, and if so, how the results would be affected.
Chen Chao-jian (陳朝建), an assistant professor of public affairs at Ming Chuan University, said the ruling encouraged the pan-green and pan-blue camps to manipulate the definition of vote-buying.
The pan-green camp is eager for the ruling to be seen as an injustice in the hope it will solidify support for Chen, put to rest any doubts about the results of the mayoral election, and boost the DPP’s electoral outlook for the legislative elections in Kaohsiung, he said.
The KMT, on the other hand, could play the ruling to its advantage by stirring up emotions, he said.
Chen Chao-jian said that both camps see southern Taiwan as the main battleground in the fight for votes.
However, the DPP will not be able to carve out more support in southern Taiwan by focusing on last Friday’s ruling because southern Taiwan is already a pan-green stronghold, Chen Chao-jian said.
"It is vital that the DPP raises other issues and tries to shift the battlefield back to central and northern Taiwan," he said. "Only the political camp that has the power to set agendas will have the ability to expand its support base."
ANALYSIS: Vote-buying ruling bad news, analysts say
By Flora Wang
STAFF REPORTERS
Friday, Nov 30, 2007, Page 3
As legislative hopefuls gear up for their campaigns ahead of the Jan. 12 legislative elections, last Friday’s ruling on vote-buying allegations concerning the Kaohsiung mayoral election risks generating more controversy before their campaigns are over, political analysts said.
The Kaohsiung District Court acquitted Ku Hsin-ming (古鋅酩) and Tsai Neng-hsiang (蔡能祥) of vote-buying charges, finding they had "solicited" votes for last December’s mayoral poll, not bought them.
The allegations surfaced when the campaign camp of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) mayoral candidate, Chen Chu (陳菊), accused Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Huang Chun-ying’s (黃俊英) camp of bribing voters at a last minute press conference late on the night before the election.
After Chen won the election, Huang went to court, demanding the election results be annulled on the basis that Chen’s midnight press conference left him no time to respond to the accusation, thereby causing his defeat by the razor-thin margin of 1,140 votes.
Huang won in the first trial against Chen, but lost in the second and final trial on Nov. 16, in which the Kaohsiung branch of the Taiwan High Court said Chen’s victory was valid.
Ku later admitted that he had rented two buses to transport voters to an election rally for Huang on the eve of the election and paid them on the return trip from the rally for their votes for "a candidate in the Kaohsiung mayoral election and a Kaohsiung City councilor candidate."
The court found that although the two defendants admitted they had paid NT$500 per person, the money should be considered payment for time and energy spent at the rally, rather than as a bribe as defined under the Public Officials Election and Recall Law (公職人員選舉罷免法).
The court said that payment made at campaign events organized by groups to solicit support for a specific candidate are not equivalent to vote-buying.
Kaohsiung Prosecutor Lin Yung-fu (林永富), who probed the case and indicted Ku and Tsai, told the Taipei Times that the court’s decision was unreasonable.
A "payment" is made by an employer to an employee, he said.
Ku offered individuals on the bus NT$500 each and asked them to vote for "a candidate in the Kaohsiung mayoral election and a Kaohsiung City councilor candidate," he said, adding that this does not meet the definition of payment for labor, and therefore constitutes a bribe.
The prosecutors have said they will appeal the ruling.
Chang Hsueh-ming (張學明), lead prosecutor at the Kaohsiung branch of the Taiwan High Court Prosecutors’ Office, said the ruling had damaged the judiciary by deviating from sentences handed down in similar cases.
Five supporters of Luo Wen-chia (羅文嘉), a former DPP candidate for Taipei County commissioner, were found guilty by the Banciao District Court for paying a NT$300 "walking fee" to selected participants at a campaign rally in November 2005, he said.
In another case, a campaign manager for Taiwan Solidarity Union Legislator Lo Chih-ming (羅志明) was found guilty in Kaohsiung last year, Chang said.
Chang said that prosecutors already suspected vote-buying would occur ahead of the legislative elections -- in particular because a new system will halve the number of legislative seats -- but the Kaoshiung District Court ruling risks sending the message that "walking fees" are an acceptable way to "solicit" votes, thereby increasing vote-buying activity.
The Supreme Court last week released a list of actions that constitute vote-buying -- including the payment of "walking fees."
Deputy Minister of Justice Lee Chin-yung (李進勇) has warned legislative candidates not to be take Kaoshiung’s "special verdict" as a sign that violating the law is acceptable or that "walking fees" are not illegal.
He said any candidate or campaigners who pays such a fee to a voter would be charged with vote-buying.
Yang Chun-chih (楊鈞池), a government and law professor at the National University of Kaohsiung, said the ruling was expected to have a negative impact on how candidates run their campaigns.
"Giving people money for participating in a campaign event has long been prohibited by our society’s ethical norms," Yang said, adding that the incident would set a negative example for campaigners.
"Our electoral system has long been criticized because candidates tend to spend a great amount of money on campaigning ... This verdict was tantamount to encouraging candidates to give out as much money as they can," he said.
Yang, whose main research field is Japanese and US law, said that all ambiguities should be removed from the Election and Recall Law for Civil Servants, and all banned campaign activities should be named in the law.
US and Japanese law are clear on this matter, he said.
Yang said, however, that it remained unclear whether the ruling would affect the outcome of the January polls, and if so, how the results would be affected.
Chen Chao-jian (陳朝建), an assistant professor of public affairs at Ming Chuan University, said the ruling encouraged the pan-green and pan-blue camps to manipulate the definition of vote-buying.
The pan-green camp is eager for the ruling to be seen as an injustice in the hope it will solidify support for Chen, put to rest any doubts about the results of the mayoral election, and boost the DPP’s electoral outlook for the legislative elections in Kaohsiung, he said.
The KMT, on the other hand, could play the ruling to its advantage by stirring up emotions, he said.
Chen Chao-jian said that both camps see southern Taiwan as the main battleground in the fight for votes.
However, the DPP will not be able to carve out more support in southern Taiwan by focusing on last Friday’s ruling because southern Taiwan is already a pan-green stronghold, Chen Chao-jian said.
"It is vital that the DPP raises other issues and tries to shift the battlefield back to central and northern Taiwan," he said. "Only the political camp that has the power to set agendas will have the ability to expand its support base."