2010-02-15 14:17:32老不休
論文--銀髮族養生村規劃設計之研究 - 以長庚養生文化村為例
系統編號: | 095PCCU0358001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
出版年: | 96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
研究生: | 邱筠蓁 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
研究生(英文姓名): | Yun-Jen Chiau | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
論文名稱: | 銀髮族養生村規劃設計之研究 - 以長庚養生文化村為例 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
英文論文名稱: | A study on the senior housing by the Linkou Chang-Gung Health and Cultural Village | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
指導教授: | 林益厚 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
學位類別: | 碩士 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
校院名稱: | 中國文化大學 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
系所名稱: | 景觀學系碩士班 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
學號: | 94148023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
學年度: | 96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
語文別: | 中文 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
論文頁數: | 80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
關鍵詞: | 高齡化社會 ; 老人住宅 ; 景觀 ; 使用後評估 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
英文關鍵詞: | aging society ; senior housing ; landscape architecture ; post-occupancy evaluation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
被引用次數: | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[ 摘要 ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
隨著社會變遷、人們價值觀的不同,從前認為只有弱勢、窮困老人才會住進老人福利機構,現今因家庭或是自己本身的需求,而選擇住進福利機構的比例逐漸增加。因應老人居住需求攀升的趨勢以及高齡化社會的來臨,近年來我國許多民間企業也看準了老人住宅市場的潛力而紛紛投入老人住宅開發行列。 老人住宅規劃設計應有特殊的原則,目的是使其在日常生活當中提供輔助機能與安全。本研究以場所理論(Place Theory)之使用者感受與對環境之認知,利用問卷調查與深入訪談,了解老人居住環境景觀之規劃設計原則,佐以住戶在老人住宅生活之後的使用設施情況及滿意程度,以供今後老人住宅規劃者參考。 研究結果發現: 一、 長庚養生文化村住戶之教育程度普遍較高,學歷以大學以上之比率最高,占一半以上,且原居住地以北部地區為最多,即住戶在老人住宅之選擇區位上,優先考量以遷移至原居住地不遠之老人住宅居住。 二、 選擇住進老人住宅之原因,普遍認為他們需要老人住宅所提供之設施與服務,然而真正促使其接受正式照顧體系(quasi-formal)的主因,是由於與子女同住但子女太忙、獨居、喪偶,平時無人陪伴,但尚可照顧自己,故決定住進老人住宅。 三、 長庚養生文化村的硬體設施、無障礙設計、戶外活動空間規劃均為上選,在訪談中對於居住品質、提供之休閒活動場所與安排之評價也相當高。住戶每天花費在使用設施進行休閒活動的時間至少有1-2個小時,最多4-5個小時。本研究亦資料亦顯示隨著老人活動力之差異,愈靠近室內,其設施被使用機率亦愈高。 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[ 英文摘要 ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Social values change through time. In the past, the social welfare organizations of the elderly were only for the minority or the poor. However, nowadays, due to the need of family and one’s self, more and more elderly choose to live in these institutes. In recent years, many of our domestic enterprises have seen the potential of this market and start to develop senior housing. Special guidelines need to be followed when designing senior housing so as to assist senior’s citizen in daily life. Users’ perception toward the environment proposed in Place Theory is used in this research to conduct survey and interviews so as to explore and set out the principles for designing senior housing. Follow-up survey on how senior citizens respond to the facility and Post-occupancy evaluation are also conducted as a reference for future senior housing designing projects. The results are as follow: 1. Citizens in The Linkou Chang-Gung Health and Cultural Village, in average, have higher education background. More than half of the citizens hold a college degree or above and most of them originally live in northern Taiwan. It’s important to note that when the elderly choose the location of their senior housing, places near their original houses are always their priority. 2. In general, it is thought that the elderly move into senior housing because the need of the facility and the service it provided. However, the more realistic concerns for them to accept the quasi formal caring system are that their children are too busy to care for them, or that they live alone, or that they have lost their spouses, and that they could still take care of themselves in their daily life. 3. The facility, barrier-free design, and open space arrangement within The Linkou Chang-Gung Health and Cultural Village are among the best. During the interview, the interviewee gave high credits to the living environment and the entertainment the village provided. Residences here on average spend minimum 1~2 hours and maximum 4~5 hours on using this facility. The research shows that, due to the decreasing mobility of the elderly, the closer the facility is to the indoor, the higher the users’ rate is. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[ 論文目次 ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
第一章 緒論 第一節 問題的產生 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙2 第二節 研究動機與目的 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙5 第三節 名詞解釋 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙7 第四節 研究方法與流程 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙10 第二章 文獻回顧 第一節 銀髮族面臨的主要問題 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙14 第二節 老人住宅空間類型與居住型態 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙18 第三節 銀髮族養生村規劃設計之構想 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙21 第四節 老人住宅相關論文研究 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙27 第三章 台灣老人住宅現況及研究案例分析 第一節 台灣老人住宅發展趨勢與概況 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙32 第二節 研究案例概述 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙36 第三節 研究案例規劃設計構想 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙39 第四章 問卷調查及結果分析 第一節 研究構想與問卷設計 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙43 第二節 研究樣本及分析方法 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙48 第三節 住戶屬性資料 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙49 第四節 得知老人住宅訊息與決定進住過程分析 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙54 第五節 公共設施之設計規劃理念與使用情形調查 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙64 第六節 深入訪談結果分析 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙68 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙72 第二節 建議 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙76 第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 ∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙∙79 參考文獻 附錄一 國內老人住宅相關建築法令 附錄二 問卷調查表 附錄三 選擇老人住宅評估因子之於受訪者「教育程度」分布 附錄四 選擇老人住宅評估因子之於受訪者「職業別」分布 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[ 參考文獻] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|